[@portabletext/react] Unknown block type "undefined", specify a component for it in the `components.types` prop
← Newsletter Archive
Issue 10
Issue 10: AI in HR, what works on Monday
Practical AI moves for HR teams: hiring, policy, and workforce literacy with privacy guardrails.
What shipped
OAIC issues guidance on AI in employee data handling
The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner published guidance reminding employers that the Privacy Act applies to AI processing of employee personal information, with a specific call out for hiring tools.
Source →Fair Work Commission flags AI-related unfair dismissal claims trend
The Commission noted a small but rising number of unfair dismissal matters involving AI-assisted performance management decisions, signalling closer scrutiny on procedural fairness.
Source →DEWR releases workforce AI literacy framework
The Department of Employment and Workplace Relations published a workforce AI literacy framework to support adult learning and reskilling, focused on practical job task application.
Source →
Four actions HR teams can take this week.
This week is HR. The four actions assume you operate inside an Australian employer of more than 100 people, with a mix of HR generalists, specialists, and people leaders. Each is achievable in a working week and produces a record you can show your people committee.
- One. Audit one hiring step where AI is or could be in play. Resume screening, interview scheduling, scoring. Document the data flow and the human review point.
- Two. Draft one AI use clause for your standard employment contract or policy suite. Cover acceptable use, prohibited use, and data classification rules.
- Three. Build a one-page AI literacy primer for your people leader cohort. What AI can do well, what it cannot, and what to escalate to HR.
- Four. Talk to one employee who quietly uses AI today. Five questions. The fastest way to learn what your policy needs to address is asking the people already doing it.
Each action targets a specific HR exposure: hiring fairness, contract clarity, leader capability, and ground truth on actual use. Done together they produce a credible early-stage HR AI position inside one month.
Why HR sets the speed limit on enterprise AI adoption.
Visual 1. Indicative AI policy maturity across HR functions in Australian employers, April 2026. Sources: OAIC guidance, Fair Work Commission communications, industry survey returns. Indicative only.
Prompt of the month
Prompt of the week.
Setup: This prompt produces a draft AI use policy clause set, plus a manager talking-points sheet. Paste your existing acceptable use policy text and the top three roles in your business. The model returns three policy clauses, three role-specific guidance notes, and a list of escalation triggers.
You are an HR policy advisor supporting an Australian employer of more than 100 people. You support a Head of People preparing an AI use policy update. Inputs I will provide: - Existing acceptable use policy text. - Top three job families in the business and a one-line description. - Known AI tools approved for use, if any. - Industry sector and any specific privacy obligations beyond the Privacy Act 1988. Produce: 1. Three policy clauses suitable for inclusion in the people handbook, covering acceptable use, prohibited use, and data classification. 2. Three role-specific guidance notes, each no longer than 100 words, written in plain English for the relevant manager. 3. A list of five escalation triggers that require HR review before AI is used, with a one-sentence reason for each. Do not invent obligations the inputs do not mention. Where evidence is insufficient, flag the gap and suggest a primary source for the user to consult. Treat any reference to specific employee personal information as a sign that the input was not properly redacted and stop.
How to use it: Paste your existing acceptable use policy. Replace any specific employee references with role descriptors before pasting. Run the prompt. Send the policy clauses to your legal team for sign-off and the role-specific guidance to the relevant managers.
Risk: Models will draft clauses that sound legally tight but may not reflect your specific industrial instrument or enterprise agreement. Treat every clause as a starting draft. The legal review step is where the industrial weight sits. Privacy obligations beyond the Privacy Act may also apply in your sector.
One monthly edition. Four sections. ~1,200 words. Free.
Subscribe free